<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Ian &#187; amazon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianrosenwach.com/index.php/category/amazon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianrosenwach.com</link>
	<description>web, technology, advertising, and tunes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:26:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Another reason why Amazon won&#8217;t commission on sales from shortened URL&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://ianrosenwach.com/index.php/2009/07/another-reason-why-amazon-wont-commission-on-sales-from-shortened-urls/</link>
		<comments>http://ianrosenwach.com/index.php/2009/07/another-reason-why-amazon-wont-commission-on-sales-from-shortened-urls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianrosenwach.tumblr.com/post/148543736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
There’s a post on Search Engine Journal about a new Amazon policy of not paying out commission to Amazon Associates who drive a referral (sale) using a “shortened” URL. The post focuses a lot on implications to social media marketing, but it may be about something different &#8211; PageRank and natural search.

Amazon leverages it’s inbound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fianrosenwach.com%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F07%2Fanother-reason-why-amazon-wont-commission-on-sales-from-shortened-urls%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fianrosenwach.com%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F07%2Fanother-reason-why-amazon-wont-commission-on-sales-from-shortened-urls%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>There’s a post on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/amazon-affiliates-social-media/11654/">Search Engine Journal</a> about a new Amazon policy of not paying out commission to Amazon Associates who drive a referral (sale) using a “shortened” URL. The post focuses a lot on implications to social media marketing, but it may be about something different &#8211; PageRank and natural search.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.designhammer.com/news/images/24.png" align="left" width="180" height="90"/></p>
<p>Amazon leverages it’s inbound Associate links improve its PageRank, which determines natural search listings.  I’m not an SEO expert, but another post at SEJ talks about how Amazon uses a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-and-the-seo-benefits-of-affiliate-tracking-links/7669/">301-redirect “bot”</a> to change affiliate links into a more “natural” type of link and pass PageRank.</p>
<p>If Amazon commissions on shortened link it leads to a slippery slope, that over the long term could jeopardize an important value of their vast Associate program &#8211; improving Amazon’s natural search results.  This is not a decision about social media as much as natural search and affiliate links.</p>
<p>The question of affiliate links and PageRank/SEO is a fun debate I’ll delve into in more detail in a later post. The big question &#8211; does the fact a Pubilsher is using an affiliate link compromise their objectivity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ianrosenwach.com/index.php/2009/07/another-reason-why-amazon-wont-commission-on-sales-from-shortened-urls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon to Acquire Zappos.com for $847 Million &#8211; Bits Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://ianrosenwach.com/index.php/2009/07/amazon-to-acquire-zappos-com-for-847-million-bits-blog-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://ianrosenwach.com/index.php/2009/07/amazon-to-acquire-zappos-com-for-847-million-bits-blog-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianrosenwach.tumblr.com/post/147049485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Amazon to Acquire Zappos.com for $847 Million &#8211; Bits Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com: Big news in the e-commerce world.  Zappos was always great at humanizing their brand and being very customer-focused.  That philisophy is in sync with some of Amazon’s core beliefs, and I don’t doubt it played a major role in the acquisition.  That, plus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fianrosenwach.com%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F07%2Famazon-to-acquire-zappos-com-for-847-million-bits-blog-nytimes-com%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fianrosenwach.com%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F07%2Famazon-to-acquire-zappos-com-for-847-million-bits-blog-nytimes-com%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/amazon-to-acquire-zapposcom/">Amazon to Acquire Zappos.com for $847 Million &#8211; Bits Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>: Big news in the e-commerce world.  Zappos was always great at humanizing their brand and being very customer-focused.  That philisophy is in sync with some of Amazon’s core beliefs, and I don’t doubt it played a major role in the acquisition.  That, plus the significant market share Zappos has in a rapidly growing sector of e-commerce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ianrosenwach.com/index.php/2009/07/amazon-to-acquire-zappos-com-for-847-million-bits-blog-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
