Yesterday Google and Facebook both announced they were cracking down on “fake news” sites that are using their ad networks to make money.

First some background: Google and Facebook have publisher networks that display ads sold by Google on their site.  The revenue from those ads is split between the Publisher and Google. For publishers and companies that don’t have an Ad sales team, or bloggers that doesn’t have time to sell ads, these programs earn them income.

Google and Facebook will start banning publishers that distribute fake news from their networks.

What is a Fake News Site?

thoughtpolice

Neither company provided much context on how they’ll be determining what news sites are “fake”, and by extension which news sites are real. Oddly, I couldn’t find any post from the companies announcing the change. The most detail was found in quotes in the Wall Street Journal, emphasis mine (behind a paywall).

From Facebook –

“While implied, we have updated the policy to explicitly clarify that this applies to fake news,” the spokesman said…”

Google, being the big Company it is, was more forthcoming –

Google said Monday that it is updating its policies to ban Google ads being placed “on pages that misrepresent, misstate, or conceal information about the publisher, the publisher’s content, or the primary purpose” of the website. The policy would include sites that distribute false news, a Google spokeswoman said.

We have Facebook deciding what is real vs. fake, and Google having plenty of leeway deciding the existential purpose of a site.

Should we trust Google and Facebook to make those determinations? I trust that they’ll bar sites that use hate speech, violent images, and the like, but we should acknowledge this is a slippery slope.

When anyone – the government, a news agency, or a tech company (!) – is making a moral determination based on content, transparency is needed.

With Great Power…

There’s little doubt the recent election is playing into these decisions.

Maybe swaths of employees at Facebook and Google posited that fake news sites helped Trump win the election and this was a solution to having the same problem again. They built support across the company and couldn’t be ignored. Good for them! And I mean that, no bitterness whatsoever.

Yet we should take pause here. I won’t go into the rabbit hole of the meaning of the words real and fake, but Facebook and Google will play a role in the reality we live in. They are deciding what is fake and what is real news, and influencing the financial stability of those sites.

Think about it.

{ 0 comments }

AT&T, Time Warner, and Digital Convergence

by Ian Rosenwach 10.25.2016

“The question is, are people really going to watch what we make on a computer screen or not,” said Bewkes. “I think an awful lot rides on whether that happens or not.” – Jeff Bewkes in 2000 at the time of the AOL/Time Warner merger (to Kara Swisher) AT&T is in the process of acquiring Time […]

Read on →

Like Tweeting? You’ll Love Nuzzel Newsletters

by Ian Rosenwach 9.8.2016

I recently started a newsletter using Nuzzel and have found it to be one of the most well thought-out curation platforms out there. As a news junkie now I can curate my own daily newsletter instead of sharing links throughout the day using different mediums. For Curators – Nuzzel Newsletters Nuzzel Newsletters are a new […]

Read on →

The Impact of Apple TV Universal Search on Content Apps

by Ian Rosenwach 9.16.2015

Summary: If universal search for Apple TV is widely adopted there are implications for viewer behavior as well as media companies and their Apple TV content apps. They may no longer play the role of gatekeeper, and instead need to focus on the user experience and structuring data to appear high in Apple TV search results. There […]

Read on →

Curation, Algorithms, and Having a Point of View

by Ian Rosenwach 6.26.2015

With the emergence of Apple Beats 1 Radio, Apple News, Facebook Instant Articles, Twitter’s Lightning, and Instagram’s new Explore feature, content and curation are all the rage in big tech. Ben Thompson sums it up nicely on Stratechery in a post entitled Curations And Algorithms – It’s possible that algorithms will one day be superior to humans […]

Read on →

Apple News Format and the Custom News Feed

by Ian Rosenwach 6.8.2015

RSS will always hold special place in my heart. The first two web products I built were RSSColumns; an RSS feed aggregator with 1-click RSS subscriptions for your Google Reader or My Yahoo! pages, and a mobile RSS feed aggregator and syndicator called WordTube. (Warning: the sites do not meet modern design standards.) Today Apple announced Apple News Format, a […]

Read on →

2014 Predictions Revisited

by Ian Rosenwach 12.24.2014

It’s prediction season! 2015 predictions coming soon, but first I’ll revisit my 2014 predictions and see how I did. Here are my 2014 predictions and my self-assigned grade for each. 1 – A Big Year for Female Leaders I predicted that a female would be named CEO of a large company and generally women would rise […]

Read on →

Technology + Fashion = Social Utility

by Ian Rosenwach 10.9.2014

We’re only in the beginning of the convergence of fashion and technology. What will the future look like? (My) Definitions Fashion is how we express ourselves to the outside world. Technology is using tools to improve the quality of life. Technology becomes a utility when paired with fashion. Since many of the utilities in our […]

Read on →

Only Apple

by Ian Rosenwach 9.11.2014

Now I know what “Only Apple” means. After reading more about the Apple Watch late last night 1, it became clear to me that only Apple could launch the products services they can at the scale they can. Below are some of the elements that, when combined, make Apple the only Company that can accomplish what they […]

Read on →

How to Save Mankind

by Ian Rosenwach 8.28.2014

“press 1 for billing.” “press 2 for technical help.” “press 3 for sales.” “press 6 to speak to an operator.” Stop the madness. Someone, please, make a touchscreen, smartphone-focused customer service app. It would look like this – You get the idea. Why do people have to wait to hear what option each # on the […]

Read on →